Difference between revisions of "practice3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(3) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
certainty is the downfall of true practice | certainty is the downfall of true practice | ||
</PRE> | </PRE> | ||
[[Category:Dozen]] | |||
[[Category:Public_Record]] |
Latest revision as of 10:52, 11 May 2024
The Problem of Experience |...What is the problem of experience? the problem of experience is what the modern Scientists have not yet come to grips with -- the resolution of the subject and object subsequent to the cartesian split and dispensing with Platonic forms of material perfection the problem is 'what is experience if there is no consistent experiencer?' |Are you saying that in order to have an experience there needs to |"exist" an experiencer? that is the common-sense argument, yes |...there is the experience, but no experiencer. I disagree. :> there is experiencer, but it is merely not consistent. we do not say that the wave 'does not exist', only that it is composed of different contents (water-volume) at each moment as it moves along |In meditation you can experience the lack of a self, nobody can experience a lack of self. that is a contradiction in terms and constitutes a meaningless reference |the lack of any entity other than the 5 skandhas. I suggest that there is some dispute as to the *existence* of this 'self' or whatever we might call fluxuating wheel of samsara that our karma powers, and, not only this, but that the 5 skandhas may or may not constitute elements of this 'false self', but in any case may substantiate a centrality into which they aggregate I do not dispute that the centrality changes continuously, but I cannot say it 'does not exist' -- I am rather convinced with Descartes of the opposite, however, though not the longlastingness or individuation of this existence as some sort of separate entity (I have not disproved to myself what is called among Buddhists interdependent origination, and find this to be a more centrally- agreed-upon doctrine than that of a particular interpretation of no-self or sunyata these are overly complex concepts and I welcome correction as to their particular meanings should your tradition or vision vary from what is presented above (upaya comes in strange form at times) |This experience is very convincing. Give it a try. certainty is the downfall of true practice