Difference between revisions of "authorized teachings"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(dozen cat) |
|||
Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
[[Category:Dozen]] | [[Category:Dozen]] | ||
[[Category:Public_Record]] |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 11 May 2024
Five Criteria of Authentic Instruction the path of buddhism consistently includes an examination of any presumed permanent self, organization or society. with this in mind, herein find an expansion on the instruction of Deshung Rinpoche III, as quoted by hermes@euronet.nl (David Sullivan) as regards "Buddhism" |"No matter how good a teaching may sound, no matter how profound or |eloquent it may be, or how similar to other true teachings it may |appear, it is wise to have reservations about any doctrine that |promises to lead to this or that spiritual goal. Such a teaching |should be examined carefully before you embark on its path. this is very profound instruction and lies at the heart of buddhism |...a doctrine that is worthy of study and practice should be one |that was taught by Lord Buddha himself. if this is understood to be an historical statement, then we must reject it, for from outside a system of knowledge we cannot come to discern the past as one may attempt to discern the future with fortune-telling for this reason it is here rephrased so as to become more inclusive: a doctrine that is worthy of study and practice should be one which is taught by Lord Buddha himself. this does not carry the necessary historical reference, allowing that the dedicated may establish a relationship, through skilfull means (_upaya_), with the Buddha directly, or through a lineage which may purport to confer these teachings. in *each case* we must satisfy *ourselves* that this connection is sound, and if others may disagree with our assessment, their continued skepticism should be encouraged, not dissuaded |Of all teachers, Lord Buddha is the one who attained the highest |possible spiritual enlightenment, and through his great compassion |taught others the way to that same enlightenment. ... trash for the converts. discard this as propaganda |"...students should make sure that the teachings spoken by Lord |Buddha are among those that were collected by the great compilers such |as Vajrapani and Manjushri, the great bodhisattvas who bore the |responsibility of preserving the direct teachings of Lord Buddha in |written form. again, very important advice, and we must first come to know, therefore, who these great compilers were, and why there is a focus upon them in the preservation of the Buddha's teachings unfortunately, this sets up a domino-effect wherein we must then discover a means to determine the legitimacy of accounts regarding the bodhisattvas, unless we come to establish a direct relationship with them |"...students should ensure that the teachings in question are |among those expounded by the great pandits such as Nagarjuna, Asanga, |and others. ... here the domino-effect begins, and we see that the intent is to support the lineage-system in a manner similar to that of countless other mystico-religious schools. that this tails off in a generalization ("great pandits such as..... and others....") is to the writer's credit, for the path of awakening is diverse, and the great pandits from a variety of cultures, schools, lineages, and religions |"...the teachings should be among those that were meditated on by |the great yogis and siddhas of India and Tibet. here we enter into the folly of cultural bigotry, though we can see why there is such attachment to the instruction of these fine teachers instead, a more inclusive alternative is here stated: the teachings should be among those meditated upon by the great yogis and gurus of the world. |They should also be included among the texts that were translated |by the great translators from their original Sanskrit into other |languages. again, this becomes acceptable when we generalize 'Sanskrit' to 'language' Deshung Rinpoche III wishes to insularize the way of buddhism into a religious containment, and with good reason. however, to do so will eventually corrupt the instructions of the Buddha at base, through attempting to place into lasting structure that which is a formless and empty (sunyata) wisdom |"...the teachings should be well known among great Buddhist |scholars. They should not be recondite teachings of doubtful |veracity, doubtful origin, or cryptic sense. in a generalized manner ("buddhist" rather than the named "Buddhist") this is quite profound. beware of those who market the name of the Buddha for purposes of promoting social lineage, however. the wisdom of the Buddha comes in many packages, to many doorsteps, through many carriers, and no single source guarantees awakening for all people |"When you have found teachings that meet all these criteria, you can |be confident that you have found authentic teachings that are worthy |of your time, effort and study." |-- Deshung Rinpoche III, oral translation by Jared Rhoton, "The Three |Levels of Spiritual Perception" (Wisdom Publications, 1995), pp.6-7. very discerning and here restated more simply and inclusively: bring skepticism to any doctrine which purports to lead to a goal of power (spiritual or no). such a teaching should be examined carefully before you embark on its path. * a doctrine worthy of study and practice should come from the very heart of the source to which it attaches itself (in the case of buddhism, direct from the Buddha) * students should make sure that the teachings which derive from this source were collected by individuals who were present at the time of instruction, those who took it upon themselves to collect and redistribute the teachings themselves * students should ensure that the teachings in question are among those expounded by the great pandits of the culture from which the teachings themselves derive * the teachings should be among those meditated upon by the great practitioners and teachers of the world. they should also be included among the texts that were translated by the great translators from their original into other languages * the teachings should be well known among the community of scholars dedicated to them. they should not be recondite teachings of dubious veracity, dubious origin, or cryptic sense when you have found teachings that meet all these criteria, you can be confident that you have found authentic instruction that is worthy of your time, effort and study. beyond this lies danger and such confidence is less surely placed